Who does the IOC think they are, denying the shining Obarrassing duo the 2012 Olympics? This is inconceiveable! That a board of mere mortals, the dregs of society, clearly biased and uninformed, would dare to deny Obarrassing his goal? Clearly race is behind this; it must be. Chris Matthews' legs must be aching today, the tingle gone, faded into a fond memory, one that I'm sure he relives nightly in his sordid little left wing dreams.

Clearly, the international community is getting just as tired of Obarrassing's "I Love Me" efforts as we here at home are. He's an empty suit with a smile, propped up by a mindless pack of willing automatons. Fortunately, as the weight of actual responsibilities presses on him, more and more of them are seeing that the man is all hat, no cattle.

The Olympic torch will burn brightly, but the light of Obarrassings self-aggrandizement has, at least momentarily, been snuffed.

Congratulations, Rio!

"You’ll need the insights and critical thinking skills you gain in history and social studies to fight poverty and homelessness, crime and discrimination, and make our nation more fair and more free."

This is a line from Obarrassing's upcoming speech to school children. All this time, I've been thinking America was the land of the free, where everyone has an opportunity. Again, my foolish patriotic nature has apparently blinded me to the reality of enslavement and discrimination that lurks outside my door. This is the type of thing that, true or not, will creep into your child's thoughts. The more they hear this sort of anti-American propaganda, the more true it becomes in their minds. This is why I'm disturbed by Obarrassing's speech. Sure, it's just one speech. Tomorrow. But with his ego, and his agenda, you can rest assured that there will be more, and each of them will be sprinkled with this kind of suggestive blather. If this were Joe Liberal, sitting on a bus, it would be some guy sharing his opinion. It's not... it's the President of the United States, being pumped into hundreds of thousands of classrooms simultaneously. This is indoctrination, and this is exactly what we don't want.

Here are a couple other gems: "Because when you give up on yourself, you give up on your country," and , "I’m working hard to fix up your classrooms and get you the books, equipment and computers you need to learn. But you’ve got to do your part too. So I expect you to get serious this year. I expect you to put your best effort into everything you do. I expect great things from each of you. So don’t let us down – don’t let your family or your country or yourself down."

Why not just use a little guilt, too? I'm working hard to make it better for you; so gosh, please, don't let me down, Bobby. Or your parents. Or your country. Guilt is a great tool for an ineffective parent, sure to burden a child with a whopping dose of insecurity. Again, combine this with being pitched in a school setting, and you're compounding the problem. I don't really need my child being demeaned by his President.

And despite the actual content of the speech, I was listening to a liberal blogger today on a national radio talk show. He attributed the reluctance of some parents to let their kids sit in on tomorrow's speach to their misgivings about having a black president. The left can't grasp the fact that we can actually disagree with someone's philosophies and ideas without taking their race into account.

Hijacking Young Minds

My child's school superintendent was quite surprised when we expressed concerns over the upcoming forced indoctrination session that Obarrassing has planned. "Why wouldn't you want ___________ to listen?" they asked.

1) My child has an excellent teacher, and I'd rather my child spend an extra hour with her, actually learning, than being primed to vote as a Democrat and having his head filled with nonsense about climate change and socialist utopias.
2) Because it's my job, not Obarrassings, to instill the importance of hard work, education, and community service in my child.
3) Because Obarrassing should have more important things to do than campaign to elementary schools.
4) Because I beleive that roughly 99.73% of his ideas are harmful to our country, our children, and life as we know it on planet Earth, and I don't needed him promoted blindly by the schools.
5) Because my child doesn't "serve the president," it's the other way around. Or at least, it's supposed to be.

Schools need to teach kids about the government, the branches, and checks and balances. We need to teach respect for the office of the Presidency, not blind devotion to a man who's basically a vacuous ego with feet.

When liberals protest, no matter how disruptive, loud, or disrespectful, it's a beautiful, essential expression of free speech, of standing up against "the man." This is true whether they're promoting abortion, calling George Bush a terrorist, saving whales or chaining themselves to trees. (Too bad they wouldn't try chaining themselves to the whales for a change...)

But let an average American take time off from work to show up to disagree with Obarrassing's "Death to Health Care" program, and suddenly it's a vast, right-wing conspiracy funded by insurance companies and manned by closet Nazis. And good Lord, if they happen to be wearing suits... well, we know that just couldn't be! Well-dressed Americans, protesting? Clearly, this is too bizarre to comprehend, and thus, must be the result of a black op of some kind.

It's an interesting double standard, and yet, the more I listen to these arrogant, self-centered blowhard Dems, the more I'm starting to think that they ACTUALLY BELIEVE this to be the truth. Is this possible, and if so, how?

It's apparent to most that Shrieker Pelosi isn't accessing anywhere near the normal level of human intellect. This may explain the problem. Perhaps bits of Nancy Pelosi's brain have been aerosolized (probably as a result of flying around in a delapidated, horribly outdated aircraft with tragically faulty air circulation and cabin pressurization) and have spread throughout elected Dems. Once lodged in the unsuspecting Dem's brain, the Pelosicytes infect them, pumping massive doses of fermented estrogen and surplus botox into their cerebellums, causing the host politician to become completely, irreversibly, deranged.

Another cause could simply be the sudden presence of Al Franken. That dropped the average IQ in D.C. from slightly-below-normal to turnip.

Regardless, it's a problem we must deal with. Stand up. Speak out. Exercise your rights to free speech while you still can. And please, for safety's sake, if Nancy Pelosi walks into the room, hold your breath.

Henry Louis Gates, Jr.: VIW

Henry Louis Gates Jr., VIP, was also clearly a VIW... a victim in waiting. He has probably spent his entire adult life waiting for an opportunity to play the victim card, and now an unsuspecting professional has blundered into his trap. Sgt. Crowley should be commended for doing his job, and doing it well. But he's trapped in the morass that is our politically correct society.

To top it all off, Obarrassing decides to set race relations back by about a decade by opening his mouth with absolutely no idea of the specifics of the case, armed only with his own racism and a desire to help Mr. Gates wave the victim flag.

Shame on you, Mr. President.

Supporting the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment to the Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."



Lots of liberal-minded folks want us to believe this is intended to mean that the states can arm official militias, not that the average citizen (that's you and me) have the right to bear arms. Well, here are just a few quotes from some folks who might have had some insight into the founders intent:


"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." (Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights.)


"The great object is that every man be armed . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution.)


"The advantage of being armed . . . the Americans possess over the people of all other nations . . . Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several Kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (James Madison, author of the Bill of Rights, in his Federalist Paper No. 46.)


I, for one, don't see a lot of ambiguity in these statements. Personally, I don't consider the 2nd amendment as simply bestowing upon me a right; I consider it a call to exercise my responsibility as a citizen. Exercise your 2nd amendment rights - and responsibilities - while you still can.

Where will we go?

When your doctor points to his federal healthcare treatment guidelines manual and says "I'm sorry, Ted, but I'm not allowed to authorized any more chemo," where will you go? You won't get the help you need in Canada, or Mexico.

When "cost-cutting" kicks in under Obarrassing's proposed health care plan, it will be in the form of cutting back pay to doctors and hospitals, fewer choices for medications and treatments, "negotiating" lower prices for medications with the drug companies, and in rationing care. Don't think it won't happen here, it's happening everywhere else where there's socialized medicine.

What's worse here is that the sheepification of the American people has rendered us, it seems, unable to look out for our own best interests. By the time everyone glued to American Idol realizes what's happening to their country, it will be too late. We're like frogs being brought to a slow boil.

MAKE SOME NOISE. Call your representatives. E-mail them. Speak out... while you still have the right to do so.